Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

@wking wking commented Dec 11, 2015

As discussed in #231. I'm in favor of rolling it back into
config.json
, but we aren't there yet. I also added
backticks around the filenames for consistency with bundle.md.

This seemed uncontroversial enough to go straight to a PR (and not via
a mailing list thread), but I'm happy to spin up a mailing list thread
around it if anyone thinks I'm overlooking a contentious issue.

@wking wking force-pushed the lifecycle-runtime.json branch from 1f7d5a0 to 42c2cde Compare December 11, 2015 21:38
@wking wking changed the title runtime.md: Mention runtime.json in the lifecycle lifecycle: Mention runtime.json Dec 11, 2015
@hqhq
Copy link
Contributor

hqhq commented Dec 16, 2015

LGTM

@philips
Copy link
Contributor

philips commented Dec 16, 2015

this is fine, needs rebase, we should discuss removal of runtime.json though.

@wking wking force-pushed the lifecycle-runtime.json branch from 42c2cde to 0a55d5c Compare December 16, 2015 17:41
As discussed earlier [1,2].  I'm in favor of rolling it back into
config.json [3], but we aren't there yet [4].

[1]: opencontainers#231 (comment)
[2]: https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/231/files#r46735828
[3]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/0QbyJDM9fWY
     Subject: Single, unified config file (i.e. rolling back specs#88)
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:53:20 -0800
     Message-ID: <[email protected]>
[4]: https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/blob/4a63e81a807edec3d67ed2b6bd99a6c2b288676f/bundle.md#container-format

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <[email protected]>
@wking
Copy link
Contributor Author

wking commented Dec 16, 2015

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:50:04AM -0800, Brandon Philips wrote:

this is fine, needs rebase…

Rebased around #269 with 42c2cde0a55d5c.

… we should discuss removal of runtime.json though.

+1. My take on that is here 1, and I'm happy to go over any
concerns people have with it.

 Subject: Single, unified config file (i.e. rolling back specs#88)
 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:53:20 -0800
 Message-ID: <[email protected]>

@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member

LGtm

crosbymichael added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2015
@crosbymichael crosbymichael merged commit e79365a into opencontainers:master Dec 17, 2015
@wking wking deleted the lifecycle-runtime.json branch December 21, 2015 21:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants